Between Messaging and Meaning: What Pakistan's Public Campaigns Teach Us About Social Change

A big-picture review of Pakistan's Social and behavior change communication efforts over three decades
Desk Notes | 1 of 4 policy essays | SBCC series | March 2026

The Moment That Makes the Question Urgent

Pakistan is no stranger to public crisis. Over the past two decades, the country has confronted polio, rapid population growth, climate disasters, a global pandemic, recurring heatwaves, and the spread of digital misinformation. In each case, government institutions, international agencies, and civil society partners have reached for the same instrument: public communication designed to shift behavior. This instrument goes by a formal name: Social and Behavior Change Communication (SBCC). Broadly defined, SBCC refers to the strategic use of communication to promote positive health and social outcomes, grounded in behavior change theory and tailored to the social and cultural conditions of target populations. In practice, it includes everything from door-to-door engagement and mass media campaigns to interpersonal counseling, social norms programming, and digital outreach.SBCC is not peripheral to public policy. It is central to how states translate policy design into population behavior. A vaccine does not protect a child if a parent refuses it. A nutrition protocol does not reduce stunting if families cannot access or understand complementary feeding. A heat warning system saves no lives if communities do not trust the institutions issuing the warning or cannot act on the advice. Communication, in this sense, is the connective tissue between policy and behavior.Pakistan is a particularly instructive case because of the scale and diversity of its experience. Over several decades, campaigns have addressed polio eradication, family planning, maternal and child health, girls’ education, sanitation, nutrition, COVID-19 prevention, and climate-related hazards. Some have been among the most intensive public communication efforts in the region. Yet their lessons remain largely siloed within individual programmes and are rarely examined together.This article begins a broader inquiry: what does Pakistan’s accumulated SBCC experience reveal, taken as a whole, about the relationship between messaging and social change?

What Has Been Built

Pakistan has developed significant institutional capacity in public communication, and that capacity deserves recognition.The most visible example is the polio eradication programme. Today roughly 400,000 vaccinators conduct door-to-door campaigns reaching more than 45 million children in each immunization round. Around 68 percent of frontline workers are women, reflecting a practical reality. Female health workers can enter homes and build trust with mothers in ways male workers cannot. The social mobilization architecture behind this effort, coordinated through federal and provincial Emergency Operations Centres and extending down to union council level, represents one of the largest community engagement systems in the developing world.That infrastructure has also evolved. Pakistan’s National Emergency Operations Centre surveyed more than 2,600 female frontline workers in high-risk districts and convened workshops across the country to gather their insights and co-design solutions. Pakistan was the first country in the Global Polio Eradication Initiative to launch such a co-design programme. This step recognized that frontline workers are not just messengers but sources of community knowledge.Population welfare communication has its own long history. Pakistan’s first Family Planning Scheme was launched in the 1965 to 1970 Five-Year Plan, and mass media became a central vehicle for population messaging from the 1970s onward. One of the best-known examples was “Aahat,” a six-part prime-time television drama broadcast on PTV in 1992 and produced with Johns Hopkins University. The drama used storytelling to introduce modern contraception and birth spacing to Pakistani audiences. Rather than delivering instruction, it embedded behavioral messages within narrative relationships. Even in the early 1990s, this reflected an understanding that persuasion requires emotional resonance.PTV also played an important role in agricultural extension. Programming on crop management, pesticide use, and fertilizer application provided practical information for rural audiences with limited access to formal extension services. Research on Pakistani farmers’ media habits confirms that television often served as their most accessible source of agricultural guidance.Another milestone was UNICEF’s Meena Communication Initiative, first broadcast in the early 1990s. The animated series followed a young South Asian girl navigating issues of education, health, and gender equality. In Pakistan, Meena and her brother Raju were designated ambassadors for children’s rights, and the programme was integrated across education and health campaigns. By giving girls a relatable protagonist, the series addressed the deeply embedded social norm of excluding girls from education.More recently, the COVID-19 response created a Communication Cell within the Ministry of Health, supported by UNICEF and the Gates Foundation. The cell monitored misinformation across media platforms, coordinated messaging across government departments, and provided regular briefings to the National Command and Operations Centre. It functioned as a real-time communication management hub.Other institutional channels reinforce this infrastructure. The Lady Health Worker programme continues to provide community-level communication on reproductive health and nutrition. WASH programmes have produced detailed behavioral research on sanitation practices. Nutrition programmes have integrated SBCC with cash transfers and feeding support, with randomized trials demonstrating measurable effects.Taken together, this body of work reflects sustained investment in communication. Pakistan’s SBCC history is not a story of neglect.

What Has Remained Structurally Constrained

Yet across these sectors, several recurring structural tensions appear.The first is the gap between messaging and the conditions that enable behavior change. SBCC is often reduced to information dissemination, encouraging compliance without addressing the structural barriers behind behavior. In Pakistan this pattern appears repeatedly. Sanitation messaging struggles when households lack water connections. Nutrition campaigns face limits when food insecurity is structural. Heat warnings matter little when communities lack electricity or cooling. Without supporting infrastructure, behavior change remains fragile.Pakistan’s population welfare experience illustrates the same dynamic. Analyses from the 1990s noted that low contraceptive uptake often reflected poverty and limited access, not ideological resistance. Communication campaigns could not compensate for service gaps. Agricultural extension messaging faced similar limits when farmers lacked access to reliable inputs or credit.The second tension is fragmentation. Pakistan’s SBCC landscape has largely evolved through project-based financing. Programmes in health, sanitation, education, and climate adaptation operate on separate timelines and institutional architectures. The polio social mobilization network, Lady Health Workers, WASH programmes, and heat action plans function largely independently. There is no unified national framework guiding formative research, message design, or evaluation across sectors.The third constraint is the funding cycle. Many SBCC interventions are financed through short-term donor projects. Community trust, which forms the foundation of behavior change, takes years to build but can erode quickly when programmes end or staff rotate. In high-risk polio districts, repeated campaign visits without improvements in broader services have sometimes generated fatigue and distrust. Research suggests that education and mobilization alone cannot overcome vaccine resistance where communities feel ignored or underserved.The fourth tension concerns the digital information environment. During COVID-19, Pakistan experienced a sharp rise in health-related misinformation across WhatsApp, Twitter, and YouTube. Studies found that while misinformation made up a minority of messages, it circulated longer than verified information. Similar dynamics have affected polio campaigns. In 2019, fake anti-vaccine videos forced temporary suspension of vaccination drives and left millions of children unvaccinated.The point is not that communication failed. The communication environment itself has shifted in ways that make traditional SBCC approaches increasingly insufficient on their own.

A Changing Risk Context

These structural challenges are not new. What has changed is the risk landscape in which they operate.Climate change is now an operational reality for Pakistan. The 2015 Karachi heatwave affected roughly 65,000 people and caused more than 1,200 deaths in under ten days. In response, Karachi developed Pakistan’s first Heat Action Plan, drawing lessons from Ahmedabad in India. Yet heat-related illness continues to strain health systems during subsequent heat events.Pakistan remains among the countries most exposed to climate-related health risks despite contributing less than one percent of global emissions. Floods, droughts, vector-borne disease, and urban heat stress interact with existing vulnerabilities including gender inequality, rural poverty, fragile health systems, and informal urban housing.Climate stress also complicates communication itself. Communities coping with food insecurity, displacement, or extreme heat are harder to reach with preventive messaging and harder to persuade toward behaviors whose benefits appear distant.At the same time, Pakistan’s digital information ecosystem is transforming rapidly. Smartphone use is expanding, social media has become a major information source, and misinformation spreads quickly through encrypted messaging networks. Pakistan’s COVID-19 response demonstrated both the possibilities and limits of centralized communication management in such an environment.Underlying all of this is trust. Where institutions have delivered services alongside communication, trust has often held. Where communities experience repeated messaging without meaningful response to their needs, distrust grows. Evidence from polio-resistant communities suggests that residents often object not simply to vaccination campaigns but to a broader pattern of being communicated at rather than engaged with.

Why a Systems-Level Reflection Is Necessary

Pakistan’s SBCC experience has generated a substantial body of practice. The polio social mobilization network, the Lady Health Worker programme, the COVID communication cell, the Karachi Heat Action Plan, population welfare media campaigns, and decades of research across nutrition, WASH, and education collectively represent one of the most extensive repositories of applied communication experience in the region.What is missing is a systems-level analysis. Existing evaluations remain programme-specific. They explain what worked within individual interventions but rarely examine broader structural patterns across sectors.Such analysis is increasingly necessary. Pakistan is entering a period in which the frequency and complexity of public health and climate risks are increasing. Heatwaves will intensify. Climate-linked disease risks will expand. Digital misinformation will continue to challenge public communication. The populations most exposed to these risks are often those least reachable through conventional communication channels.A comprehensive review would need to synthesize lessons across major campaign domains, examine how governance and financing shape communication design, assess how climate risk alters behavioral contexts, benchmark Pakistan’s experience against international frameworks, and propose a forward-looking model for SBCC in a climate-health era.

Introducing the Forthcoming Inquiry

This article is the first in a series that Manara is publishing as part of a broader analytical initiative. The series will examine what Pakistan’s SBCC experience, taken as a whole, can tell policymakers, donors, and development practitioners about designing more resilient communication systems.The forthcoming Manara white paper, Messaging, Meaning & Social Resilience: A Systems Review of SBCC in Pakistan, will undertake a structured desk review and comparative systems analysis drawing on programme evaluations, academic research, and international frameworks. Rather than replicating sector-specific literature, it will attempt to connect the dots across it.The premise is simple. Pakistan has done more in SBCC than the analytical literature has captured. At the same time, it faces a future in which public communication systems will be tested by converging climate, health, and information risks.Understanding what has been built, where its structural constraints lie, and what a renewed systems approach might look like is not merely a technical exercise. It is a strategic necessity.Between messaging and meaning lies a significant gap. Closing that gap carefully and on the basis of evidence is the work this series begins.

What Are We Missing? 
Desk Notes is, by design, exploratory. We write to think, not only to conclude. If you are working on any of these questions, if you disagree with the framing, if you have data or experience that complicates or challenges the picture we have drawn here, we want to hear from you.Reach us at manara.policy@gmail.com

References

Ahmed, S., Naz, F., Nayyab, S., and Sohail, A. 2025. “Engage Less, Provide More: Community Health Workers’ Perspectives on How to Overcome Opposition to Polio Vaccination in Pakistan.” Global Public Health 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2465645ArchivePK. 2016. “History of Pakistan Television (PTV Ka Safar).” http://archivepk.blogspot.com/2016/05/history-of-pakistan-television-ptv-ka_8.htmlCentre for Development Communication. n.d. “Aahat: Pakistan.” The Communication Initiative. https://www.comminit.com/early-child/content/aahat-pakistanCountry-Data. n.d. “Pakistan: Population Planning Policies and Problems.” http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-9792.htmlFriedrich Naumann Foundation. 2021. Misinformation in Pakistan During COVID-19. Islamabad: Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Cited in: Media Support International. 2023.Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI). 2023. “Women Health Workers Hold the Key to Eradicating Polio.” https://polioeradication.org/news/women-health-workers-hold-the-key-to-eradicating-polio-2/Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI). 2025. “Pakistan: The Women Heroes of Polio Eradication.” https://polioeradication.org/news/pakistan-the-women-heroes-of-polio-eradication/Independent Monitoring Board of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. 2019. IMB Report. Cited in: Ahmed et al. 2025.Javed, M. H., et al. 2022. Analysis of COVID-19 Misinformation on WhatsApp Groups in Pakistan. Cited in: Media Support International. 2023.Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association (JPMA). 2025. “Heatwave Associated Mortality in Karachi, Pakistan: A Public Health Emergency.” https://www.jpma.org.pk/index.php/public_html/article/view/21662Karachi Heatwave Management Plan. 2017. Karachi Heatwave Management Plan: A Guide to Planning and Response. Urban Unit and ESSA Technologies, with support from CDKN. https://heathealth.info/wp-content/uploads/HeatwaveManagementPlan.pdfMedia Support International. 2023. Countering Disinformation in Pakistan. Stockholm: Media Support International. https://www.mediasupport.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Countering-Disinformation-in-Pakistan-2023.pdfOnlineKhabar. 2021. “The Story Behind Meena Cartoon and Its Link with Nepal.” https://english.onlinekhabar.com/the-story-behind-meena-cartoon-90s-kids-favourite-tv-show-and-its-link-with-nepal.htmlPMC. 2023. “Global Warming in Pakistan and Its Impact on Public Health as Viewed Through a Health Equity Lens.” https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9975889/PMC. 2024. “Pakistan’s National COVID-19 Response: Lessons from an Emergent Response to the Pandemic.” https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11330871/PMC. 2025. “Mission of Polio Eradication in Pakistan: A Review on Challenges and Future Recommendations.” https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11930701/PubMed. 1992. “Pakistan Embarks on New Campaign to Reduce Fertility.” https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12317621/ResearchGate. 2012. “Television Viewing Habits Among Farmers in Pakistan.” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233741201_Television_Viewing_Habits_Among_Farmers_in_PakistanScienceDirect. 2007. “Pesticides Exposure in Pakistan: A Review.” https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160412007001389Soofi, S. B., Khan, G. N., Ariff, S., Habib, A., Kureishy, S., and Ihtesham, Y. 2022. “Effectiveness of Unconditional Cash Transfers Combined with Lipid-Based Nutrient Supplement and/or Behavior Change Communication to Prevent Stunting Among Children in Pakistan: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.Tribal Cultural Heritage in India. n.d. “eBook: Free Resources for Rural Education — UNICEF Meena Archive.” https://indiantribalheritage.org/?p=18668UNICEF SBC Guidance. 2025. “Social and Behaviour Change Communication.” https://www.sbcguidance.org/understand/social-and-behaviour-change-communicationWikipedia. 2025. “Social and Behavior Change Communication.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_and_behavior_change_communication